Pages

Thursday, May 20, 2010

It's the Lies










Image credit: Photo by
Katie Tegtmeyer on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

"Why do some men and women cheat on their partners while others resist the temptation?" asks author Tara Parker-Pope in a recent New York Times Well blog post on the science of commitment. The post, which has been doing the social networking rounds lately, goes on to discuss recent scientific findings around sex drive, flirting, temptation and relationship satisfaction.  Interesting stuff. Unfortunately, none of it actually has much to do with the issue of cheating.

Oh, sure. It all seems to. The (mis)perception that sexuality is the central issue in infidelity is so common it's rarely questioned. After all, isn't that what cheating is? Sex outside of one's primary relationship? But to cheat, one not only has to be involved in a primary relationship and have sex outside of it, but also hide it.  Open relationship? Not cheating. Multiple anonymous partners? Not cheating. Calling your partner on the phone when you see an attractive person in a bar and saying "honey, I'm going to have sex with someone else" before having sex? Probably not the most tactful way to handle a breakup or start a discussion on monogamy, but still, technically, not cheating. Sex outside a primary relationship is only cheating if it involves deception and lying, either explicit or implicit.

In discussions about infidelity (and boy, marry a sex addict and you'll have a lot of them), people get sidetracked -- a lot -- over issues of sexuality and monogamy, while ignoring the fundamental issue of dishonesty and breach of trust. We may have sex, inside and outside of committed relationships, for a whole host of reasons, but we cheat (that is, lie about having sex outside our relationship rather than openly having multiple partners) for only one: a desire to control our partner(s). And why do we do it?  Often fear, specifically fear of of losing the partner or something important that the partner controls access to, such as money or children.  But sometimes just for the love of the power itself.

In the end, (as Parker-Pope acknowledges may be the case) if we want to know what makes relationships successful, looking at sexual fidelity, loyalty or the ability to resist temptations is not what matters most.  While she touches on the idea of "self-expansion," the focus I've experienced in recovery has been on trust, respect and honesty.  Because in cheating, and healing from it, sex isn't the issue.  It's the lies.

6 comments:

  1. So true, and very well said. I think another fear is losing oneself--wanting a relationship, but at the same time being terrified of being consumed by the other person.
    ReplyDelete
  2. So true. I've found that there's a huge difference in the understanding of that between people who have been through it, and people who haven't. It's not the pictures in your mind about what actually happened that are so devastating- it's the lies that they told you to hide it. And learning (on both sides, as I think that at times the person who is cheated on lies to themselves so that that they won't have to accept that it's going on) to live without the lies is the largest and most painful process, in my opinion.
    ReplyDelete
  3. This makes a lot of sense. Cheating is about dishonesty. Since I've never been married, I haven't experienced marital infidelity. I did have a boyfriend who was honest about his attraction for other women, so he didn't cheat. But I must say, constantly hearing about how hot other women were was some form of abuse. I'm glad that Mr. Honesty is no longer in my life.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the link to the article. I had not thought about the amount of lying that goes into covering up infidelities. But it seems that there is a lot of fear involved and perhaps power over another, and maybe a dash of resentment thrown in as well. Thought provoking post.
    ReplyDelete
  5. This cuts to the core. When we had our disclosure. I remember saying something like "It's not the cheating!!! it's the lying!!!" to which he replied "what was I supposed to do?" well. yes. he could've told me. and then the relationship would've been good and over before we started. But no, there was something about me he wanted to hold onto. My money, my child, the semblance of a balanced home life. I am still struggling to understand. Should I be flattered that at some level he wanted me that much? I think he craved stability. But by treating me that way he set the whole pack of cards -a -wobbling. Control? interesting. In a knowledge-is-power sort of way. I know about this, I can handle it this is my life, and what you don't know can't harm you. It's paternalistic isn't it, patronising and yes now I think about it, controlling - although the victim is blissfully unaware of the control.
    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh - this is SO right on! Husband's sex with other women BEFORE we were in a committed relationship doesn't trouble me at all. I think if he'd had sex with prostitutes before we were in a committed relationship (I don't think he did) I would have found it disgusting, but it would not have imploded my world the way the lies and betrayal did - not even close. (I probably would have looked for a different person to date though.)

    TRUST - so hard for me to give and so hard to rebuild once annihilated. It's still the core issue we're working on 3 years later.
    ReplyDelete